Thursday, 18 September 2014

Dont make Critisicm a Curse!!!!!

5 Steps to Surviving Criticism

      I've had this friend of mine who came and asked me....am I looking fat in this dress.....she probably knew the answer....bt iii ended up saying her a lie.When comments turns destructive, put on the brakes while you still can.


 
Whether you know your best friend looks ridiculous in a shirt that’s way too small or a co-worker's presentation needs improvement, you’re constantly in a situations where a negative opinion you offer could (you believe) provide useful insights.

Needless to say, though, it’s not so pleasant to be on the receiving end of someone else’s critical comments, especially when they feed your own insecurities. Perhaps your friend shares with you the opinion that you might benefit from toning down your sarcastic sense of humor around people who don’t know you all that well. Yet, that sarcasm may stem from your own fear of seeming dull or stupid—and now, on top of that insecurity about your social skills, you worry that you’re offending people as well.
         
Unfortunately, many of us are laden with enough self-criticism to last a lifetime, not to mention the criticism that we might receive from our nearest if not dearest friends and family. Our self-esteem takes a hit each time we let the inner voices in our heads chide and complain about the mistakes we’re making, the people we’re unintentionally offending, and the opportunities we let go by.
You can eventually wrest control of your critical inner voice but it’s much more difficult to control the external critical voices of people whose opinion you value. Once you realize that the criticism you’re hearing is really only the criticism that you think you’re hearing, though, even those voices become easier to endure.
These five strategies will help you survive the dangerous waters of criticism with your self-esteem, and relationships, intact:
 
1. Resist the temptation to criticize back. It’s all too easy when you’ve been attacked (or think you’ve been attacked) to lash out at your attacker. It’s the old children’s comeback: “Are, too!” In the playground, such retorts are not only commonplace but perhaps even adaptive. However, in the realm of grownups, by answering a criticism with a criticism, also called a tu quoque, you only end up looking as if the critical shoe fits you just fine.  
Making the problem worse is the fact that people tend to respond to the initial critical comments by feeling offended so they escalate their comeback, exacerbating the conflict even more. For example, your romantic partner complains that you don’t seem to return phone calls or texts very regularly, and you respond by pointing out your partner’s clinginess. Not only are you invalidating your partner’s observation, but you’re also ratcheting up the level of the argument by criticizing your partner’s personality rather than behavior. What started out as perhaps a reasonable request now becomes the basis for a critical free-for-all.
 
2. Avoid projecting your insecurities onto the criticism. When we hear criticism from others, we sometimes amplify its magnitude by interjecting our own insecurities into the picture. The process is similar to the defense mechanism of projection, in which you transfer your own anxieties onto those around you, reading far more ominous meanings into their words than they intended. You might feel unhappy with the state of your home at the moment, recognizing that some solid closet cleaning is in order. It’s late on a Friday afternoon when a neighbor stops by to chat. You notice that she seems to be taking in the scene with a bit of a furrowed brow. She remarks that she’s looking forward to the weekend and having a chance to catch up on her spring cleaning. Immediately, you jump to the conclusion that she’s accusing you of being a slob. If it weren’t for the guilt creeping around the edges of your consciousness about the sorry state of your bedroom (which she might not even be able to see at the moment), the comment would go by unnoticed. With your insecurities primed, however, you’ll see the otherwise innocent comment as a condemnation of your housekeeping abilities. From there on, the interaction will almost invariably go downhill.
 
             In this scenario, nothing critical was even uttered by your neighbor. What about if someone actually does share a critical observation about you, with you? In this case you are being criticized, not imagining it. Again, however, unless the criticism is an attempt to bring you to your knees in tears, projection can put you at risk of over-reacting. A co-worker may be offering what he believes to be helpful criticism and has even given the matter careful deliberation. However, because it touches a sensitive nerve, you find yourself unable to hear the positive tone in your co-worker’s voice, or even his attempt to embed it in an otherwise supportive remark. People often do try to soften their criticism with counter-balancing statements (“I really liked the way you did X, but Y could’ve used some improvement”). A good personal critic uses the “criticism sandwich.” You place the critical statement between two positive statements so that the person you’re trying to help with your comment is better able to hear it. Many of us are savvy to this strategy, however, and ignore the top and bottom of the sandwich, only hearing the problematic middle section. By overcoming the tendency to use projection, you’ll be better able to focus on the positive elements of this type of communication.

3. Try to understand where it’s coming from. It’s possible that you’re not the one projecting at all, but that your critical partner is the one struggling with feelings of inadequacy. For some people, criticizing others is the only way they can feel good about themselves. Threatened by your happiness and well-being, they try to throw you off your game by incessantly pointing out your inadequacies. It may be hard to fend off these attacks, especially if (as I noted above) they are particularly well-placed barbs that tap into your insecurities. If you value your relationship with this person, or if you have no choice but to be around that person, then you’ll have to figure out a way to reframe these interactions. Seeing their need to criticize as stemming from their weaknesses will help you protect not only your self-esteem, but could also potentially help this person overcome the need to criticize. Without feeding into their need to feel superior, you can offer them a kind word or two that can help alleviate their anxiety. Point out their strengths, and they’ll be better able to acknowledge yours.

4. Ask whether there’s truth to the criticism. So far, the general assumption I’ve made is that the critic is being overly critical, even if that critic is you. What if there’s something about you that could truly benefit from improvement? Perhaps you’ve been wearing the same (now-filthy) sneakers or comfortable shoes every day, all day, from the workplace to the backyard. They’re looking pretty tattered at the edges and although they may be fine for a walk in the park on a muddy day, have no place in the home or office. A friend offers you the criticism sandwich, noting that it’s great that you like to wear comfortable shoes outside but you might want to consider keeping a spare pair for indoor use and that (here’s the top of the sandwich) you look great in the sweater you’re wearing today. Instead of reacting with outrage at the thought that this person has the audacity to attack your taste in footwear, you might take a quick peek at your feet and see if perhaps the comment bears taking seriously. In fact, if you really thought about it, you might come to appreciate this person’s bravery in bringing up such an awkward topic.

5. Try to resolve destructive criticism in constructive ways. The criticism sandwich is only one way to provide criticism in a supportive context. In "constructive" criticism, you focus on the behavior, not the person; "destructive" criticism aims to eviscerate its target, and it can truly erode relationships. In a study of 118 married couples, University of Notre Dame psychologists Kristina Peterson and David Smith found that couples who expressed destructive criticism toward each other, as judged by observers, felt higher levels of perceived criticism than when their interactions showed higher levels of constructive criticism. This study supports the idea that destructive criticism contributes disproportionately to a couple’s perception of general discord in the relationship. In marriages, high levels of perceived criticism are what go on to erode both the relationship and each individual partner’s mental health.
In any relationship, if you sense that criticism is taking a destructive turn, it’s time to take a step back, put the brakes on, and look rationally at who’s being criticized, for what, and why. By taking as objective an approach as possible, you can help support both your and your partner’s feelings of self-worth.

These steps would help you get outta criticism.....and will also give you ways to avoid criticizing others with inferiority complex!!!!

Sunday, 14 September 2014

Do communication happen only between humans......? Take a look at this before you make an opinion

 

Cat Kiss

 
Cat communication is the transfer of information by one or more cats that has an effect on the current or future behavior of another animal, including humans. Cats use a range of communication modalities including visual, auditory, tactile, chemical and gustatory.
 
 
 
The communication modalities used by domestic cats have been affected by domestication.
Vocalizations
Cat vocalizations have been categorized according to a range of characteristics.
Schötz categorized vocalizations according to 3 mouth actions: (1) sounds produced with the mouth closed (murmurs), including the purr, the trill and the chirrup, (2) sounds produced with the mouth open and gradually closing, comprising a large variety of miaows with similar vowel patterns, and (3) sounds produced with the mouth held tensely open in the same position, often uttered in aggressive situations (growls, yowls, snarls, hisses, spits and shrieks).
 
Brown et al. categorised vocal responses of cats according to the behavioural context: (1) during separation of kittens from mother cats, (2) during food deprivation, (3) during pain, (4) prior to or during threat or attack behavior, as in disputes over territory or food, (5) during a painful or acutely stressful experience, as in routine prophylactic injections and (6) during kitten deprivation. Less commonly recorded calls from mature cats included purring, conspecific greeting calls or murmurs, extended vocal dialogues between cats in separate cages, “frustration” calls during training or extinction of conditioned responses.
 
Miller classified vocalisations into 5 categories according to the sound produced: the purr, chirr, call, meow and growl/snarl/hiss.
 

Purr

 
The purr is a continuous, soft, vibrating sound made in the throat by most species of felines. Domestic cat kittens can purr as early as two days of age. This tonal rumbling can characterize different personalities in domestic cats. Purring is often believed to indicate a positive emotional state, but cats sometimes purr when they are ill, tense, or experiencing traumatic or painful moments.
 
The mechanism of how cats purr is elusive. This is partly because cats do not have a unique anatomical feature that is clearly responsible for the vocalization. One hypothesis, supported by electromyographic studies, is that cats produce the purring noise by using the vocal folds and/or the muscles of the larynx to alternately dilate and constrict the glottis rapidly, causing air vibrations during inhalation and exhalation. Combined with the steady inhalation and exhalation as the cat breathes, a purring noise is produced with strong harmonics. Purring is sometimes accompanied by other sounds, though this varies between individuals. Some may only purr, while other cats include low level outbursts sometimes described as "lurps" or "yowps".
 
Domestic cats purr at varying frequencies. One study reported that domestic cats purr at average frequencies of 21.98 Hz in the egressive phase and 23.24 Hz in the ingressive phase with an overall mean of 22.6 Hz. Further research on purring in four domestic cats found that the fundamental frequency varied between 20.94 and 27.21 Hz for the egressive phase and between 23.0 and 26.09 Hz for the ingressive phase. There was considerable variation between the four cats in the relative amplitude, duration and frequency between egressive and ingressive phases, although this variation generally occurred within the normal range.
 
One study on a single cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) showed it purred with an average frequency of 20.87 Hz (egressive phases) and 18.32 Hz (ingressive phases). A further study on four adult cheetahs found that mean frequencies were between 19.3 Hz and 20.5 Hz in ingressive phases, and between 21.9 Hz and 23.4 Hz in egressive phases. The egressive phases were longer than ingressive phases and moreover, the amplitude was greater in the egressive phases.
 
It was once believed that only the cats of the genus Felis could purr. However, felids of the genus Panthera (tigers, lions, jaguars and leopards) also produce sounds similar to purring, but only when exhaling. The subdivision of the Felidae into ‘purring cats’ on the one hand and ‘roaring cats ’ (i.e. non-purring) on the other, originally goes back to Owen (1834/1835) and was definitely introduced by Pocock (1916), based on a difference in hyoid anatomy. The ‘roaring cats’ (lion, Panthera leo; tiger, P. tigris; jaguar, P. onca; leopard, P. pardus) have an incompletely ossified hyoid, which according to this theory, enables them to roar but not to purr. On the other hand, the snow leopard (Uncia uncia), as the fifth felid species with an incompletely ossified hyoid, purrs (Hemmer, 1972). All remaining species of the family Felidae (‘purring cats’) have a completely ossified hyoid which enables them to purr but not to roar. However, Weissengruber et al. (2002) argued that the ability of a cat species to purr is not affected by the anatomy of its hyoid, i.e. whether it is fully ossified or has a ligamentous epihyoid, and that, based on a technical acoustic definition of roaring, the presence of this vocalization type depends on specific characteristics of the vocal folds and an elongated vocal tract, the latter rendered possible by an incompletely ossified hyoid.

Saturday, 13 September 2014

Be Smart Wid Your Words!

 

 Let Their Words Do the Talking

Verbal cues to detect deception.

6 Ways to Get Anyone to Do Anything

By reading this you will understand the power of words..... I once asked one of my senior to forward me her project as I needed to submit it....I followed up with her, was good to her but still she did not turn up.....because that was a favor that she was doing to me..... this blog will help you take out work from people just by your use of words....not by your so called "SWEETNESS"!
There are several subtle ways to get people to commit to helping you out.
 


 
Adults and children alike often resist direct commands to perform tasks, especially when the people issuing the requests have no real or perceived authority. People who reluctantly comply with commands often develop resentment, which could take the form of passive aggression or not completing tasks as well as they could have been done.
There are, however, several techniques that reduce such resistance and increase the probability that people will do what you want them to—and, at the same time, maintain good relationships. with you. The trick is to get people to do what you want because they want to not because they have to.

1. Use the Magic Word
  My parents told me when I was a youngster that "please" was the magic word. I soon learned that when I prefaced my requests with "please," I tended to gain compliance. The word's magic powers of have carried over to adulthood. People really do tend to comply with requests when the word "please" is embedded in the request unless they have a good reason not to comply. Children will comply with their parents' edicts more readily if the word "please" is embedded somewhere in the command. "Please" is a command softener that gives the impression that the person who is being asked to perform a task has a degree of control in task compliance.

2. Say, "You're Welcome"-Plus
When thanked, most people respond, "You're welcome." But to make your response more powerful, add, "I know you would do the same for me." This invokes the psychological principle of reciprocity. When people are given something tangible—or even something intangible such as a compliment—they are psychologically predisposed to give something in return. Reciprocity increases the probability of compliance to future requests.

3. Get a Commitment
Getting a verbal commitment from people increases the likelihood of compliance. This technique is based on the psychological principle of consistency. People tend to follow through on verbal commitments because to do otherwise would induce cognitive dissonance or guilt. Verbal commitments are especially powerful when they are made in public. Getting a commitment transfers the responsibility of completing the task from the requester to the person asked to perform it, thus creating a sense of responsibility.

Example One
  • Mom: I want your room cleaned up by the time I get home from work this afternoon.
  • Child: Okay, I will.
  • Mom: Good. I'm counting on you. Do I have your commitment that your room will be clean?
  • Child: Yes, I'll clean my room right when I get home from school.
Example Two
  • Salesperson: I am going to leave you with some brochures. Will you, at least, give me your commitment to look at the material before you make a decision to buy our competitor's product?
  • Customer: Sure, I'll take a look at the material this evening.
In both examples, the probability of compliance increases significantly when a verbal commitment is made to take action on each request.

4. Embed Your Command
Embedded commands contain direct requests but the requests are surrounded by command softeners. You're still issuing commands; however, in this technique, the key is to cleverly embed the command within a string of softeners, the easiest being to add the word "please." For example:
  • Command: Wash your hands before eating dinner.
  • Embedded Command: Please wash your hands before dinner.
Sophisticated embedded commands can be constructed by using additional command softeners to the request. For example:
  • Command: Fund my project.
  • Embedded Command: After reading my proposal, the only conclusion that I think you can come to is to fund my project.
5. Be Presumptive
Construct your request with the presumption that the person to whom you are making the request has already completed the task. The presumptive gives the illusion of commitment where no commitment has actually yet been made. Most people will accept an implied commitment and feel an obligation to complete the task. And instilling a sense of urgency to the request will increase the probability of compliance. Adding implied incentives to the presumptive further increases the probability of compliance. The incentive may look like a bribe, but incentives serve as a reward for good behavior—and increase the probability of future compliance. Rewards do not have to be issued upon the completion of all requests; in fact, they're more effective when issued intermittently. The following examples illustrate the presumptive technique.
  • Mom: After you rake the yard, why don't we go out and get an ice cream sundae.
  • Child: Okay!
  • Dad: Why don't you rake the leaves (handing a rake to his child) and I'll bag them.
  • Child: Okay.
  • Salesperson: After we close this deal, where do you want to have dinner?
  • Client: I know of a nice restaurant nearby.
6. Add a Sense of Wonder
Introducing a sense of wonder in conversation or in the form of self-talk also increases the probability of compliance. People typically want to tell others about their expertise. Introducing a sense of wonder takes advantage of this tendency. If you need help with a task, seek out a person with that skill and during the course of your conversation simply muse, "I'm working on this project and I'm having some difficulty. I was wondering if you may have run into the same problem." An expert in the field will have difficulty not volunteering his or her expertise to show their mastery. They may even offer their services to help you solve the problem. This creates the illusion that the expert is offering his or her expertise and not being requested to provide advice or free services.


   Thank you so much for reading my blog. I hope this has been beneficial for you and you guys would try this out to get people to complete your tasks, not because you want them to do but because they want to do for you...
 

Friday, 12 September 2014

Behold Liers

How to Spot a Lie

I really liked this posted from fb.....so I have reposted it in my blog!!!!!
A method so simple you could learn it from a toddler.

 

Humans are primates and, therefore, social creatures. We generally prefer to mate, hang out in groups, and share experiences. Our brains are highly evolved to decode subtle facial expressions and understand complex speech. You can see evidence of our communal nature everywhere—families, sports teams, classrooms, restaurants. We like to do virtually everything together.
Even lie.
Lies come in all shapes and sizes. Some forms of dishonesty are major, such as marital infidelity or embezzling funds from work. Others, though, are of the “white lie” variety and include complimenting a friend on her dress even though you think it makes her look like an Oscar statuette.

       

But have you ever stopped to consider why we lie?

We typically think of lying in black-and-white moral terms, but there is more to the story. To be sure, people lie in an effort to maximize their own gain. We might lie about the amount of money we have (if we are trying to bargain for a good deal), how much we enjoyed a movie (if we are trying to win the favor of a date), or the amount of effort we put into a project (if we are trying to impress a boss). In many cases, stretching the truth din these ways doesn’t feel like a bold violation of our moral code precisely because we, ourselves, are the direct beneficiaries.
There are other reasons people lie: We are inclined toward dishonesty when we are tired, or when we are in the company of others. When fatigue sets in, lying can be a way of saving energy or other resources. Ever pretended to reach your allotment of push-ups by fudging the number a bit during a workout? We're also are more likely to lie when others around us do.
Lying, like many social phenomena, is contagious.
Interestingly, as common as lying is, we have also evolved fairly sophisticated mechanisms for “lie detection,” as psychologists fancifully call it. The phrase evokes all sorts of detective television dramas and Las Vegas card shark films based on the idea that anyone can learn how to spot a liar. Common lore holds that dishonest people look away when they lie, or that bluffers at the poker table fiddle with a ring or exhibit  some similar “tell” that gives away their true mental state.
In a recent series of studies, though, participants succeeded at detecting lies no better than they would through guessing.
Infants, however, can detect one particular type of lie—emotional dishonesty. Because young children are preverbal and lack the life experience to recognize verbal lies, researchers turn to their understanding of feelings. In a recent study, Eric Walle examined the ability of 16- and 19-month-olds to recognize honest emotion. Like the best researchers in psychology, Walle appears to have had a blast in his process of making parents either hit or miss their own hand with a plastic hammer and then react with either put-on or authentic emotions. In a second study, parents were instructed to show either authentic or exaggerated fear. It turned out that 16-month-old children could not detect emotional artifice while 19-month-olds could. The latter group was able to pick up on whether feelings were appropriate to the context, appropriate in their intensity, and whether they were displayed appropriately.
Somewhere in that second year, we learn to spot fake.
What do toddlers and plastic hammers have to do with you and your marriage, your friendships, or your work? Lots. Rather than trying to play a TV psychic with an uncanny ability to deduce information based on belt buckles, wedding rings, and facial tics, just try being human. You can use yourself as an “emotional barometer” by paying attention to how you feel when someone talks to you. A recent study by Leanne ten Brinke and her colleagues showed that while people could only guess liars at chance (actually, worse than chance—43 percent), their accuracy improved when they went with their gut. Using computer reaction time tests that measure non-conscious attitudes, participants were more likely to pair deceit-related words with liars and honesty-related words with truth tellers. In fact, their accuracy improved significantly.
A gut feeling probably isn’t enough to take someone to court or to openly accuse a co-worker. An instinct about honesty is, however, enough to duck out on a dodgy date or to confront a friend or lover. Your hunches may not always be correct, but they may be correct enough of the time that they become a useful lie detector.
 I hope you guys liked this post....